概念史實踐：時間史和空間概念 柯塞勒克 英文原版 The practice of conceptual history

基本信息/Product Details

出版社 : Stanford University Press; 第 1st 版 (2002年7月2日)

語言 : 英語

平裝 : 384頁

ISBN-10 : 0804743053

ISBN-13 : 978-0804743051

商品重量 : 517 g

尺寸 : 15.24 x 2.44 x 22.86 cm

頁面參數僅供參考，具體以實物為準

書籍簡介/Book De*ion

柯塞勒克是過去半個世紀中重要的歷史和歷史學理論家之一。他的工作對當代文化研究的影響，遠遠超出了對歷史方法的實際問題的討論。他是Begriffsgeschichte的主要倡導者和實踐者，這是一種歷史研究的方法論，側重於基本概念的發明和發展，這些概念構成了一種獨特的歷史存在於世界的方式。

本卷中的十八篇文章闡述了柯塞勒克歷史概念的四個論點。首先，歷史進程以一種獨特的時間性為標誌，與自然界中的時間性不同。這種時間性是多層次的，有不同的加速和減速率，它不僅作為歷史事件發生的矩陣，而且作為決定社會現實的因果力量，發揮着自身的作用。

第二，歷史現實是社會現實，是一個內部分化的功能關係結構，其中一個羣體的權利和利益與其他羣體的權利和利益發生碰撞，並導致各種衝突，其中失敗被體驗為一種道德失敗，需要反思 "出了什麼問題"，以確定衝突本身的歷史意義。第三，歷史學的歷史是一部歷史學家語言演變的歷史。在這方面，柯塞勒克的工作與巴特、福柯和德里達的工作相一致，他們都強調歷史學作為話語而非學科的地位，並以歷史話語的構成性為特點，反對其對字面真實性的要求。

最後，柯塞勒克的歷史概念的第四個方面是，一個適當的歷史主義歷史概念是由這樣的認識所告知的：我們所説的現代性只不過是在我們這個時代發現歷史概念的一個方面。現代主義的缺陷--在藝術和文學以及人文和自然科學中--是發現社會和知識的歷史性的一個功能。

Reinhart Koselleck is one of the most important theorists of history and historiography of the last half century. His work has implications for contemporary cultural studies that extend far beyond discussions of the practical problems of historical method. He is the foremost exponent and practitioner of Begriffsgeschichte, a methodology of historical studies that focuses on the invention and development of the fundamental concepts underlying and informing a distinctively historical manner of being in the world.

The eighteen essays in this volume illustrate the four theses of Koselleck's concept of history. First, historical process is marked by a distinctive kind of temporality different from that found in nature. This temporality is multileveled and subject to different rates of acceleration and deceleration, and functions not only as a matrix within which historical events happen but also as a causal force in the determination of social reality in its own right.

Second, historical reality is social reality, an internally differentiated structure of functional relationships in which the rights and interests of one group collide with those of other groups, and lead to the kinds of conflict in which defeat is experienced as an ethical failure requiring reflection on "what went wrong" to determine the historical significance of the conflict itself. Third, the history of historiography is a history of the evolution of the language of historians. In this respect, Koselleck's work converges with that of Barthes, Foucault, and Derrida, all of whom stress the status of historiography as discourse rather than as discipline, and feature the constitutive nature of historical discourse as against its claim to literal truthfulness.

Finally, the fourth aspect of Koselleck's notion of the concept of history is that a properly historicist concept of history is informed by the realization that what we call modernity is nothing more than an aspect of the discovery of history's concept in our age. The aporias of modernism-in arts and letters as well as in the human and natural sciences-are a function of the discovery of the historicity of both society and knowledge.

作者簡介/Author

Reinhart Koselleck是比勒菲爾德大學的歷史教授。

Reinhart Koselleck is Professor of History at the University of Bielefeld.